Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Unmasking a Hypocrite:1

CAPTION: THE NEW WAKIL: DEFENDER OF TRUTH, FREEDOM AND THEOTHER MALAYSIA WAY OF LIFE

A doctor, an architect, and an attorney were dining at the country club one day, and the conversation turned to the subject of their respective dogs, which were apparently quite extraordinary. A wager was placed on who had the most intelligent dog. The physician offered to show his dog first, and called to the parking lot, "Hippocrates, come!" Hippocrates ran in, and was told by the doctor to do his stuff. Hippocrates ran to the golf course and dug for a while, producing a number of bones. He dragged the bones into the country club, and assembled them into a complete, fully articulated human skeleton. The physician patted Hippocrates on the head, and gave him a cookie for his efforts. The architect was only marginally impressed, and called for his dog, "Sliderule, come!" Sliderule ran in, and was told to do his stuff. The dog immediately chewed the skeleton to rubble, but reassembled the fragments into a scale model of the Taj Mahal. The architect patted his dog and gave him a cookie. The attorney watched the other two dogs, and called "Bullshit, come!" Bullshit entered and was told to do his stuff. Bullshit immediately sodomized the other two dogs, stole their cookies, auctioned the Taj Mahal replica to the other club members for his fee, and went outside to play golf.

Bullshit is precisely what we have here in the form of this legal wanker who is L'enfant terrible for his fawning faithful. A spinmeister extraordinaire whose erudite prose masks latent hypocrisy, whose vaunted intellect shields the dwarf of imbecility, whose heroic endeavours are nothing more than cowardly stabs at the heart of truth. Ah..truly a charlatan who twists the word like a modern-day rumpelstiltskin. and there are several exposes awaiting this idiot.
First up, his recent triumph in a cheapskate sorority affair which he revels in here. Its been up there for almost 2 weeks now, a sort of record in those parts, a cheesy show of self-indulgence and self-adulation that is nothing short of nauseous. To give credence to a Vanity Fair affair, he has this to say about the organisation implicitly trying to aggrandise himself among the greats:


EXHIBIT 1

"Over the years, it has featured the writings of an impressive list of distinguished writers and thinkers that include Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Milan Kundera, Vaclav Havel, Nadine Gordimer, Noam Chomsky and Umberto Eco (Wikipedia)"


oops, there is a boob in there and its self-revealing about the character of this charlatan and the reputation of this "10 million" copies worldwide circulation. Lets examine the real excerpt, pay attention to them names:


EXHIBIT 2


by some of the world's most distinguished writers and thinkers, including "Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Milan Kundera,Vaclav Havel, Nadine Gordimer, Salman Rushdie, Doris Lessing, Arthur Miller, Noam Chomsky, and Umberto Eco.

Hmmm, no Salman Rushdie in the first entry,PARAPHRASED OUT OF EXISTENCE by the lawyer, sleight of hand or slip of mind that deleted Salman, Lessing, Miller.......I wonder.

For what reason? You see the citation that awarded this year's gifthorse to this neighing idiot has this to mention:

"In August 2006, a poster declaring him to be a traitor to Islam http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/21/freedom-of-expression-award-2009-recipients-announced/


Wow! a mere poster can win an award, mah! Why dont we reward the maker with a freedom of expression award of his own for his efforts deserved a mention at a self-styled prestigious do. No mean feat that!!! By the way put 2 and 2 together and bingo you have 4.


Congratulations Malik Imtiaz, alumni of the International Islamic University, the prodigy of the vaunted Uni Debating Club, human rights champion and constitutional bugger. Another feather in your cap, this time from the anti-Islam lobby:



3.It is rather that by allowing people’s beliefs to be scrutinised, criticised and — yes — insulted, bad ideas are more likely to be superseded by better ones.http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/22/wilders-must-be-supported/

Speaks volumes, dont they?

Why not come out in the open and admit the obvious or is the glare too much for a pair of truth-phobic eyes so used to skulking around in the dark dungeons of Lord Lies' castle.


Revert: Warrior has a kind word or two about this imbecile..........................

No comments: